Legal Opinion
Timken Co. v. Vaughan
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided May 3, 1976No. Civ. A. C 76-92 APublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CONTIE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, The Timken Company (hereinafter Timken), initiated this action on March 24, 1976, to review the March 22, 1976 final Decision and Order of the Defense Supply Agency, Department of Defense (hereinafter D.S.A.), debarring Timken from eligibility for contracts with the United States or agencies thereof, and with contractors doing business with the United States or agencies thereof. A declaratory judgment and injunctive relief are sought. The Court’s jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 701,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Fair Employment Practices CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
- Abron v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1977
- Beverly Enterprises v. CalifanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. North Hills Passavant HospitalDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Fair Employment Practices CommisionAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980