Legal Opinion
Kidd v. Hillman
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 9, 1936No. Civ. 9936PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action to recover for damages to an automobile sustained in a collision. Plaintiff’s complaint alleged in substance that on or about the 18th day of January, 1931, she was operating her automobile on the Bayshore highway in San Mateo County when another automobile carelessly and negligently operated by an agent of appellant forcibly collided with her machine and damaged it. She also alleged and prayed for damages for loss of its use. The action was filed April 14, 1933. Plaintiff had previously commenced an action against defendant Hillman and others growing out of the same collision, on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Packham v. German Fire Ins., Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1900
- Sun Insurance Office v. HohensteinCity of New York Municipal Court · 1927
- Insurance Co. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Fidelity Insurance v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Sanderson v. NiemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Anheuser-Busch, Inc. v. StarleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
- Edgar T. Weekes v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., California State Auto Association v. Atlantic National Ins. Co., Atlantic National Ins. Co. v. California State Auto AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Farmers Ins. Exchange v. ArltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.