Legal Opinion
Sun Insurance Office v. Hohenstein
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided January 31, 1927PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLeary, J.
The case is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts, as follows:
1. That heretofore and on or about the 30th day of June, 1923, the plaintiff duly issued to the defendant its policy of insurance for a term of one year from said date, covering the Franklin brougham automobile belonging to the defendant against loss by fire, theft and transportation and against loss by collision in excess of $100.
2. That thereafter and on or about the 13th day of December, *8711923, and while said policy was in full force and effect, the said automobile of the defendant was involved in a collision with an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Shawnee Fire Insurance v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Washtenaw Mutual Fire Insurance v. BuddMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Shawnee Fire Insurance v. CosgroveSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
- Svea Assurance Co. v. PackhamCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1901
- Costello v. . N.Y.C. H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Gibbs v. Hawaiian Eugenia Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Powers v. CALVERT FIRE INS. CO.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
- Kidd v. HillmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. IngebretsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.