Bank of Healdsburg v. Bailhache
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sonoma County. Action to quiet title. The remaining facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
The existence and validity of a deed as translative of the title of a married woman to a tract of land, held as her separate-estate, is the question presented for consideration in this case. Josephine Bailhache, the wife of her co-defendant, John Bailhache, was seized in fee as her separate property of the land described in the pleadings. On the 12th of June, 1880, she executed a deed of it to the plaintiff. Delivery of the deed at the time of its execution is affirmed by the plaintiff and denied by the defendants. If it was not delivered it is not her deed; for one of the essential…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crowley v. Genesee Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1880
- Gashwiler v. WillisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Fitch v. BunchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
- McKiernan v. LenzenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Blen v. Bear River & Auburn Water & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1862
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stevens v. Selma Fruit Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1912
- Commercial Security Co. v. Modesto Drug Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
- Bank of Commerce v. HartNebraska Supreme Court · 1893
- Reina v. ErassarretCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co. v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.