Legal Opinion

Fitch v. Bunch

California Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1866PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Appeal from the District Court, Seventh Judicial District, Sonoma County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Rhodes, J.:

It appears from the findings, which substantially agree with the allegations of the complaint, that the defendant Bunch, wishing to exchange fifty shares of mining stock which he held in the Humboldt Tunnelling Company for certain real estate which was the separate property of the plaintiff, deposited the stock with Norton, one of the defendants, and the plaintiff and her husband, William Fitch, executed to Bunch a deed of the real estate, and deposited it with Norton, and the parties then agreed that Fitch and Bunch should visit the works of the company in the then…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Green v. PutnamNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Thompson v. GrahamNew York Court of Chancery · 1829

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
  2. People v. WattsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Simpson v. GreenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Campbell v. ThomasWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  5. Duckworth v. Watsonville Water & Light Co.California Supreme Court · 1907

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API