Polaris Industries, L.P. v. Continental Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
On summary judgment in a declaratory action, the district court interpreted advertising liability coverage as creating no obligation to defend in litigation alleging trade secret misappropriation, patent infringement, and consumer protection violations. The allegations under the Consumer Protection Act arguably fall within the coverage for unfair competition arising out of advertising activities, and we reverse and remand.
FACTS
The litigation for which Polaris Industries seeks defense coverage involves a dispute over the development of an electronic fuel- injection system…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Iowa Kemper Insurance Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Prahm v. Rupp Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Callas Enterprises, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Fluoroware, Inc. v. Chubb Group of Insurance CompaniesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
- Home Insurance v. Waycrosse, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
- Callas Enterprises v. Travelers IndemnityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- General Star Indemnity Company v. Toy Quest Ltd.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2025