Maryland Casualty Co. v. Mueller
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.
(after stating the facts as above). As shown in the statement above, the jury, in response to the first one of the issues submitted to them, found that appellee sustained “an injury which totally incapacitated him for work at his trade and for manual labor,” and in response to the second one of said issues found that such incapacity was “permanent.” Appellant insists in its first assignment-that it was error to submit the first issue, and in its second assignment that it was error to refuse to set aside the finding on that issue and the finding on the second issue and grant it a new trial. As…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lumbermen's Reciprocal Ass'n v. BehnkenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Dickerson v. McConnon & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3Cited by9 opinions
- Texas Indemnity Insurance v. StaggsTexas Supreme Court · 1940
- Stanley v. . Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Stanley v. Hyman-Michaels Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hood v. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. YotherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1957
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.