Legal Opinion

Brock v. Wright

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 6, 1989No. CV 87-963; CA A50030PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Petitioner appeals from a judgment denying him post-conviction relief. ORS 138.530(l)(a). He assigns as error the failure of the post-conviction court to specifically enforce the terms of a plea agreement. We affirm.

Six charges were brought against petitioner, most of which were related to the manufacture and sale of controlled substances. Before entry of a plea, negotiations were entered into between petitioner’s attorney and the state. A purported plea agreement resulted, under which petitioner agreed to plead guilty and the state would recommend probation if petitioner completed “agreed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Goodrich v. Farmers Feed & Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Transpacific Leasing, Inc. v. Klineline Sand & Gravel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Capps v. CuppCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. Simpson v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Hagberg v. CourseyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Cox v. HowtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  5. State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API