Legal Opinion

Cox v. Howton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 4, 2015No. C100159CV; A151196PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DE MUNIZ, S. J.

Defendant appeals a judgment granting petitioner post-conviction relief, arguing that that the post-conviction court applied the incorrect legal standard for determining prejudice. We agree and reverse and remand to the post-conviction court for further proceedings.

Our review in post-conviction proceedings is for errors of law. Chew v. State of Oregon, 121 Or App 474, 476, 855 P2d 1120 (1993). Under that standard, we are bound by the post-conviction court’s findings of fact when the evidence in the record supports those findings. Brock v. Wright, 98 Or App 323, 326, 778 P2d 999…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Gorham v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  2. Cox v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Lambert v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  4. Nichols v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API