Cox v. Howton
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DE MUNIZ, S. J.
Defendant appeals a judgment granting petitioner post-conviction relief, arguing that that the post-conviction court applied the incorrect legal standard for determining prejudice. We agree and reverse and remand to the post-conviction court for further proceedings.
Our review in post-conviction proceedings is for errors of law. Chew v. State of Oregon, 121 Or App 474, 476, 855 P2d 1120 (1993). Under that standard, we are bound by the post-conviction court’s findings of fact when the evidence in the record supports those findings. Brock v. Wright, 98 Or App 323, 326, 778 P2d 999…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montez v. CzerniakOregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Lichau v. BaldwinOregon Supreme Court · 2002
- Gorham v. ThompsonOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Moen v. PetersonOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Chew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Snyder v. AmsberryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- Cox v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Lambert v. PremoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Nichols v. PerssonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020