Legal Opinion
United States v. Miles Davis Saunders
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 3, 1992No. 91-3841PublishedCited by 130 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
A jury convicted Miles Saunders of conspiring to possess cocaine with the intent to distribute and of possessing cocaine with the intent to distribute. Saunders contends he is entitled to a new trial because the district court violated his sixth amendment right to confront witnesses in limiting the scope of cross-examination. He also challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction, the jury instructions, and the constitutionality of §§ 3E1.1 and 4B1.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines. We affirm.
I
In August 1990, while frequenting a bar in Minneapolis,…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by130 opinions
- Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- United States v. PhibbsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Noe MancillasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Truman Tolson and Darrell TolsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Victor E. Robbins, Sr., A/K/A Gene, Roy G. Robbins, A/K/A Gordon, and James HerrimanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.