Legal Opinion

Whitley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 11, 1922No. 6557PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Wichita. Tried below before the Honorable P. A. Martin. Appeal from a conviction of swindling; penalty, two years imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case. On question of insufficiency of the evidence: McDaniel v. State, 140 S. W. Rep., 232, and cases stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

DATTIMORE, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the District Court of Wichita County of swindling, and his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The State’s motion to strike out appellant’s bills of exception, because filed too late in the court below, must be sustained. Article 845, Vernon’s C. C. P., provides that in the absence of an order extending ffie time for filing, bills of exception must be filed in the lower court within thirty days after final judgment, provided the trial term extends more than eight weeks, and within thirty days after adjournment, if the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Perrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Thorpe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1899
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914
  4. Cowan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1900
  5. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Paine v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1975
  2. Viehweg v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  3. Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Mowrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Waghalter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API