Cowan v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
• The indictment is set out in the opinion. Ho further statement necessary.
1Opinion of the Court
DAYIDSOH, Presiding Judge.
The indictment, in substance, charges: That appellant, Oscar Cowan, and B. M. Williams conspired together and entered into a positive agreement with each other to obtain goods from Bice, Stix & Co., doing a wholesale dry goods business in St. Louis, Mo., under false pretenses and representations; that is, by means of the following letter, to wit:
B. M. Williams & Co.
Hardware and Stoves. Dry Goods, Boots, Shoes,
Tinware a Specialty. 19843 and Groceries.
Gainesville, Texas, 6-20, 1899.
Examined June 26, 1899. 6-22-99.
Mess. Bice, Stix & Co., Ed Levy JOI.
St. Louis, Mo.
Gentlem…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Commonwealth v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Eaton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- State v. MimsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
- Whitley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.