Legal Opinion

Cowan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 11, 1900No. 1915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

• The indictment is set out in the opinion. Ho further statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

DAYIDSOH, Presiding Judge.

The indictment, in substance, charges: That appellant, Oscar Cowan, and B. M. Williams conspired together and entered into a positive agreement with each other to obtain goods from Bice, Stix & Co., doing a wholesale dry goods business in St. Louis, Mo., under false pretenses and representations; that is, by means of the following letter, to wit:

B. M. Williams & Co.

Hardware and Stoves. Dry Goods, Boots, Shoes,

Tinware a Specialty. 19843 and Groceries.

Gainesville, Texas, 6-20, 1899.

Examined June 26, 1899. 6-22-99.

Mess. Bice, Stix & Co., Ed Levy JOI.

St. Louis, Mo.

Gentlem…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. GradyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1877

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Burrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Eaton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. Hernandez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  4. State v. MimsOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Whitley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API