Legal Opinion
Brindley v. Borough of Lavallette
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 6, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 344 (1954)
110 A.2d 157
FREDERICK A. BRINDLEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
BOROUGH OF LAVALLETTE, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division.
Decided December 6, 1954.
Mr. Aristo Dallavalle, attorney for the plaintiff.
Mr. Percy Camp, of Camp & Simmons, attorney for the defendant.
LARRABEE, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).
Plaintiffs sue to test the legality of Ordinance No. 166 adopted by the Borough of Lavallette to establish and regulate a paid bathing beach on the ocean front and the respective rights of the plaintiffs and the borough in the ocean…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Stevens v. Paterson & Newark RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1870
- Booraem v. North Hudson County Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1885
- Wolff v. Veterans of Foreign Wars, Post 4715Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Arnold v. City of OrangeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
- State v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1888
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Hyland v. KirkmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
- Velasco v. Goldman Builders, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Spiegle v. BOR. OF BEACH HAVENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Van Ness v. Borough of DealNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.