Legal Opinion
Velasco v. Goldman Builders, Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 13, 1966PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
93 N.J. Super. 123 (1966)
225 A.2d 148
FLORENCE VELASCO, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
GOLDMAN BUILDERS, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 26, 1966.
Decided December 13, 1966.
Before Judges GAULKIN, LEWIS and LABRECQUE.
Mr. Francis C. Foley argued the cause for appellants (Mr. William H. Gazi, of counsel and on the brief).
Mr. Charles Handler argued the cause for respondents Paul Goldman, individually; Goldman Builders, Inc., and Parsons Associates, a joint venture.
Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for respondents Sommers…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mueller v. NJ Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Bell v. Eastern Beef Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Highway Holding Co. v. Yara Engineering Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- O'DONNELL v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Haven Homes, Inc. v. Raritan TownshipSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Township of Middletown v. SimonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- State v. BirchNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Spiegle v. BOR. OF BEACH HAVENNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
- Englander v. West Orange Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Brookdale Pk. Homes v. Tp. of BridgewaterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.