Legal Opinion

Arnold v. City of Orange

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 25, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On final hearing on pleading and proofs.

1Opinion of the Court

I-Iowell, Y. C.

This suit is brought to restrain the city of Orange from laying water pipes through a strip of land lying in the village of South Orange, called Clark street, the title to a portion of which, to the middle of the strip, is claimed to be owned by the complainants.

*281The water pipes in question are parcel of the water-supply system of the city of Orange, but in order to reach that municipality it was deemed necessary to construct the line through the village of South Orange. Permission was granted for this purpose by the village to the city and the work was begun. The permission…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. The People v. . LoehfelmNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Matter of HunterNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ramstad v. CarrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kirkland v. City of TampaSupreme Court of Florida · 1918
  3. Murphey v. Township of LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Brindley v. Borough of LavalletteNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  5. Hendrickson v. City of AstoriaOregon Supreme Court · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API