Legal Opinion

People v. Mohr

California Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1910No. Crim. No. 1561PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

The defendant was convicted of the offense defined by section 476a of the Penal Code, it being alleged in the information that he did willfully, with the intent to defraud one C. B. Rourk, draw, utter, and deliver to one Frank Harrington, a certain check for the payment of money, to wit: twelve dollars, on the Hanford National Bank of Han-ford, a banking association, knowing at the time that he had no funds in or credit with said bank to meet or pay said check upon its presentation. Upon this conviction he was adjudged to suffer imprisonment in the state prison for two years. This is an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MatuszewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. People v. ArlingtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. People v. DenbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  4. People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. SwayzeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API