Legal Opinion

Hazel v. General Motors Corp.

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided September 30, 1994No. Civ. A. C93-0184-BG(H)PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HEYBURN, District Judge.

The Court must decide whether Defendant is entitled to protection of the one year statute of limitations applicable to products liability actions. In considering the difficult issues raised, the Court has received superb assistance from the fine memoranda and oral argument of counsel. Applying existing Kentucky law, Plaintiffs claim is barred. For Plaintiff to prevail this Court must conclude that Kentucky courts would expand the limited equitable tolling doctrine to encompass the circumstances of this case. The Court predicts that they would not do…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Wood v. CarpenterSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Dayco Corporation v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Dayco Corporation v. Firestone Tire & Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  4. William B. Lashlee, Jr. v. Morris E. SumnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Linda Miller and Barry Miller v. A.H. Robins Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Fluke Corp. v. LeMasterKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Wiseman v. Alliant Hospitals, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Bosch v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
  4. Bowden v. City of FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
  5. Harris v. JacksonKentucky Supreme Court · 2006

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API