Legal Opinion

Bowden v. City of Franklin

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 6, 2001No. 00-5089PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs-Appellants Charles F. Bowden and Jean Bowden appeal the ruling of the Honorable Thomas B. Russell of the United States District Court for the Western District of Kentucky. Plaintiffs argue that the district court inappropriately granted Defendant-Appellee City of Franklin’s motion for summary judgment prior to the close of discovery based on the applicable statutes of limitations. For reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM the district court’s order granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing this civil action.

I

In 1972, Plaintiffs purchased a tract of land for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Weikle v. SkorepaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. Wells v. RhodesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
  3. Dodd v. DYKE INDUSTRIES, INC.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2007
  4. Phifer v. CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGANDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2009
  5. Corporex Companies, LLC. v. Proskauer Rose, LLP.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2010

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API