Legal Opinion

Fluke Corp. v. LeMaster

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 2010No. 2008-SC-000530-DGPublishedCited by 73 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice MINTON.

I. INTRODUCTION.

We accepted discretionary review in this products liability case to resolve whether the Court of Appeals properly adopted foreign authority and correctly held that equitable estoppel barred the product manufacturer’s statute of limitations defense because the manufacturer allegedly concealed product defects from government regulatory agencies. We also address whether the holding of the Court of Appeals properly expanded the discovery rule beyond the classes of cases currently recognized by Kentucky law.

We conclude that the Court of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Products Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Perkins v. Northeastern Log HomesKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Hackworth v. HartCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  5. Tomlinson v. SiehlCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by73 opinions

  1. Ping v. Beverly Enterprises, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Coomer v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Mark D. Dean, P.S.C. v. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Cornett v. Johnson & Johnson & Cordis Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
  5. Cornett v. Johnson & JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API