Legal Opinion

George F. Weaver Sons Co. v. Burgess

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1959PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.

The plaintiff Weaver Sons seeks to set aside three deeds, two to the defendant City of Utica and one from the latter to the defendant Burgess. The city, proceeding under the Tax Enforcement Act (Tax Law, former art. VII-A, tit. 3), had instituted in rem tax foreclosure actions against the land of Weaver Sons in 1942 and 1943 and those actions had culminated in the deeds to the city. It is the plaintiff’s thesis that, since at the time of such foreclosure proceedings it was in a corporate reorganization proceeding under chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act (U. S. Code, tit. 11, ch. 10), no court,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Continental Illinois National Bank & Trust Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Turner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. People v. . TurnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Meigs v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. ISCA Enterprises v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Hood River County v. DabneyOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Shaffer v. Mareve Oil CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1974
  4. In re New Creek BluebeltAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Frederiksen v. LaFleurUtah Supreme Court · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API