Legal Opinion
ISCA Enterprises v. City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 2, 1991PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*694OPINION OF THE COURT
Kaye, J.
A former mortgagee in the first appeal and former property owners in the second, challenge the constitutionality of New York City’s "notice-by-request” procedure for in rem tax foreclosure actions, asking that the tax deeds on the subject properties be declared void and their interests restored. We resolve both appeals in the City’s favor, the first on the ground that petitioner mortgagee had actual notice in time to bring suit, and the second on the ground that the City’s statutory scheme for giving notice to property owners met the requirements of due process.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Schroeder v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Young Men's Christian Ass'n v. Rochester Pure Waters DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Abb Industrial Systems, Inc. v. Prime Technology, Inc., General Resistance, Inc., Zero-Max, Inc., Barry Wright Corporation, Pacific Scientific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Kennedy v. MossafaNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Harner v. County of TiogaNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- T.E.A. Marine Automotive Corp. v. ScadutoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Panther Mountain Water Park, Inc. v. County of EssexAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.