Legal Opinion

Southern Railway Co. v. Peters

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 20, 1915PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson. Action by Mit Peters against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. Heard before Hon. W. W. Haralson. Action by Mit Peters against the Southern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The case was submitted to the jury on the following complaint: “Plaintiff * * * _ claims of defendant * * * the sum of * * for damages for personal injuries in this: That on or about October 27, 1913, defendant, Southern Railway Company, a common carrier by railroad, was engaged in commerce between some of the'states, and on said date plaintiff, Mit Peters, while he was employed by such carrier in such commerce,. and…

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, C. J.—(1) The complaint in this case sufficiently sets up a cause of action under the federal Employers’ Act. It sets forth every condition under which liability arises, and sets this forth substantially in the language of the statute. — 35 Stat. L. 65, Fed. Statutes Annotated, Sup. 1909, p. 584. This is all that is required of the complaint. — Grand Trunk R. R. v. Lindsay, 233 U. S. 42, 34 Sup. Ct. 581, 58 L. Ed. 838, Ann. Cas. 1914C, 168; Seaboard Air Line R. R. v. Du Vall, 225 U. S. 477, 32 Sup. Ct. 790, 56 L. Ed. 1171; A. C. L. R. R. v. Jones, 9 Ala. App. 499, 63 South. 696.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. St. Louis, San Francisco & Texas Railway Co. v. SealeSupreme Court of the United States · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. BaumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  2. Louisville N. R. Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Mobile O. R. Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  4. Mobile & O. R. Co. v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  5. Southern Ry. Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API