Halperin v. Raville
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
STONE, P. J.
The issue for resolution on appeal is whether the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court’s decision that appellant/defendant (son) received the benefit of monies loaned to appellant’s father (father) by respondent/plaintiff (plaintiff) and is therefore obligated, along with father, to repay plaintiff. (Civ. Code, § 3521.)1 Applying the usual standards of appellate review, we conclude there was sufficient evidence permitting application of this rule of equity. Accordingly, the judgment below is affirmed.
Facts
The facts are stated in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Lifton v. HarshmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Campbell v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Irwin v. City of Manhattan BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norcal Mutual Insurance Company v. NewtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Recorded Picture Co. [Prods.] Ltd. v. Nelson Entm't, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Cal. Bank & Trust v. Del PontiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Davis v. Nissan North America, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2024