The Florida Bar v. Lancaster
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
448 So.2d 1019 (1984)
THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,
v.
Alex P. LANCASTER, Respondent.
No. 60850.
Supreme Court of Florida.
April 12, 1984.
John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Patricia J. Brown, Branch Staff Counsel, Tampa, for complainant.
Richard T. Earle, Jr., of Earle & Earle, St. Petersburg, and Robert Jackson McGill of the Law Offices of Robert Jackson McGill, Venice, for respondent.
2Per curiam
We have for review a referee's report recommending that Alex P. Lancaster be disbarred. We have jurisdiction pursuant to our authority to regulate the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Overton; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Alderman; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Ehrlich.
3Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Emslie v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. SarmientoSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
- People v. HarfmannSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Dodd v. the Florida BarSupreme Court of Florida · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by20 opinions
- Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- In re BankstonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- The Florida Bar v. PoplackSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Kinney v. Department of StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- The Florida Bar v. McClureSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.