Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Poplack

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided April 30, 1992No. 76823PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

599 So.2d 116 (1992)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Ariel POPLACK, Respondent.

No. 76823.

Supreme Court of Florida.

April 30, 1992.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John T. Berry, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Randi Klayman Lazarus, Bar Counsel, Miami, for complainant.

Steven A. Fein, North Miami Beach, for respondent.

2Per curiam

The Florida Bar petitions for review of a referee's recommended sanction that the respondent, Ariel Poplack (Poplack), be suspended from the practice of law for thirty days followed by an eighteen-month probation during which Poplack will receive psychological…

Also in this document: Dissent.

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  2. The Florida Bar v. LordSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. The Florida Bar v. LancasterSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  4. The Florida Bar v. LipmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. The Florida Bar v. ColcloughSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. ClementSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
  2. The Florida Bar v. NilesSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  3. The Florida Bar v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  4. The Florida Bar v. CenturionSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  5. The Florida Bar v. PearceSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API