State v. Puckett
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Kline, Judge. 1
Jesse Puckett appeals the decision of the Scioto County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his motion for a new trial. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because two of the witnesses who testified against him at his trial later executed affidavits swearing that they had lied at the trial. Because Puckett never filed a transcript of the hearing that the trial court conducted on his motion for a new trial, we consider this appeal without it and find that the trial court did not err in denying Puckett’s motion for a new trial.
I
In February 1995, a grand jury indicted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Sharp v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Cortez, 5-07-06 (11-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013