Legal Opinion

State v. Puckett

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 27, 2001No. Case No. 99CA2689PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kline, Judge. 1

Jesse Puckett appeals the decision of the Scioto County Court of Common Pleas, which denied his motion for a new trial. He argues that he is entitled to a new trial because two of the witnesses who testified against him at his trial later executed affidavits swearing that they had lied at the trial. Because Puckett never filed a transcript of the hearing that the trial court conducted on his motion for a new trial, we consider this appeal without it and find that the trial court did not err in denying Puckett’s motion for a new trial.

I

In February 1995, a grand jury indicted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State ex rel. Richard v. SeidnerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Hartt v. MunobeOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Sharp v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. MatthewsOhio Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. Cortez, 5-07-06 (11-19-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. EllisOhio Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API