Legal Opinion

State v. Cortez, 5-07-06 (11-19-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 2007No. Nos. 5-07-06, 5-07-07PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Although originally placed on our accelerated calendar, we have elected, pursuant to Local Rule 12(5), to issue a full opinion in lieu of a judgment entry.

{¶ 2} Defendant-Appellant, Antonio L. Cortez, appeals the judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas sentencing him to thirty months in prison. On appeal, Cortez asserts that his guilty pleas were not knowingly and intelligently made because the trial court did not inform him that his prison sentence would be served consecutively to a prior sentence imposed in another jurisdiction. Based on the following, we affirm…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. State v. EngleOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State v. StewartOhio Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. LilesOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State v. Crish, 1-08-13 (10-6-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. OwensOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. State v. CarnahanOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. State v. PhillipsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API