State v. Rambahal
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GILDEA, Justice.
Appellant Johnny Rambahal is charged with violating Minn.Stat. § 624.713, subd. 1(b) (2006), which prohibits him from possessing a pistol because of a prior conviction for a crime of violence. In the course of discovery, the State disclosed two police reports from a separate robbery investigation. These police reports contain statements of a “concerned citizen,” whom Rambahal argues has exculpatory information in his case. Rambahal successfully moved the district court for an order compelling disclosure of the citizen informant’s identity. The State appealed the order,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- State v. Joon Kyu KimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. ScottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. LitzauSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. LessleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. DresselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. LessleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. DexterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.