Legal Opinion
Paterson v. Shattuck Arizona Copper Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided October 29, 1926No. 25,371PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Lees, C.. On November 7, 1925, the summons in this action was delivered to If. L. Mundy at St. Paul, where he resides. At that time he was a director and a vice-president of the respondent, Shattuck-Denn Mining Corporation. The respondent appeared specially and moved that the service be vacated and set aside. An affidavit by one of respondent’s attorneys was presented in support of the motion. The affidavit stated that respondent was not and never had been a citizen or resident of the state of Minnesota; that it never had any property in this state or an office or place of business therein;…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cannon Manufacturing Co. v. Cudahy Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- W. J. Armstrong Co. v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Atkinson v. United States Operating Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- North Wisconsin Cattle Co. v. Oregon Short Line RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Kendall v. Orange Judd Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Dahl v. ColletteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Garber v. Bancamerica-Blair CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Sivertsen v. Bancamerica-Blair Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1940
- Klein v. Sunbeam Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Ruff v. Manhattan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.