City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. Young
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BURKE, J.
In this declaratory relief suit attacking the constitutional validity of a financial interests public disclosure statute enacted in 1969 and by its terms applying to a myriad of public officers and employees, the trial *262court rendered judgment decreeing that the statute is constitutional. Plaintiff appeals.
The public’s right to know of matters which might bring about a conflict of interest between the public employment and the private financial interests of those holding public office is a laudable and proper legislative concern and purpose. Statutory history in this state is…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by140 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Serrano v. PriestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Industrial Foundation of the South v. Texas Industrial Accident BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1976
- Baggett v. GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
135 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.