Legal Opinion
Callahan Co. v. Chickasha Etc. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 7, 1906PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The plaintiff in error, plaintiff in the court below, commenced this action to recover the sum of $3500.00, a balance due upon an executed contract for the furnishing of oil mill machinery. Said sum is admitted to be due the plaintiff, unless the defendant is entitled to recoup in damages for a breach of the contract in failing to deliver the machinery during the last days of July, 1902, and not until the 20th day of September, following.
The defendant by way of answer and cross-petition answered the petition of plaintiff as follows:
"In the District Court of Cleveland County,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Globe Refining Co. v. Landa Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Howard v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Markley v. BaldwinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Parks v. TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Clifford v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1846
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Continental Gin Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Gaines Bros. & Co. v. Citizens' Bank of HenryettaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Prager's Paris Fashion v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- National Surety Co. v. Board of Edu. of City of HugoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Terrell Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.