Prager's Paris Fashion v. Seidenbach
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
This action was instituted in the -district court of Tulsa county, Okla., by tbe defendants in error, as- plaintiffs, against the plaintiffs in error, as defendants. For convenience, the parties will be referred to as they appeared: in the district court.
Plaintiffs in their petition sought to recover on a certain bond executed by the defendant Prager’s Paris Fashion, a corporation, as Principal, and the defendant C. A. Mayo, as surety, -in an -action theretofore instituted in -the district court of Tulsa county, Okla., by said Prager’s Paris' Fashion, a corporation, against the plaintiffs in…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bokoshe Smokeless Coal Co. v. BraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Bartram v. Ohio & Big Sandy R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Callahan Co. v. Chickasha Etc. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- McGraw v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- W. P. Callahan & Co. v. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sharp v. 251st Street Landfill, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- In Re the Adoption of Baby Boy ASupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- Security State Bank of Comanche v. W. R. Johnston & Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- Neil v. Pennsylvania Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Heiser v. WoodruffCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.