Legal Opinion

People v. Hvizd

New York County Courts

Decided July 10, 1972PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohn J. Couzens, J.

Defendant, Andrew Hvizd, by omnibus motion moves as follows:

1. To inspect the minutes of the G-rand Jury and/or dismiss the indictment as based upon insufficient or inadequate evidence;

2. To dismiss the indictment upon the ground that article 15 of the Executive Law and in particular section 299 is unconstitutional upon 14 separate grounds;

3. To dismiss the indictment as insufficient on its face;

4. To grant the defendant the names and addresses of all witnesses known to the District Attorney whether or not the People intend to call said witnesses at the trial;

*6555. To grant the defendant all…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marrano Construction Co. v. State Commission for Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  2. State Commission for Human Rights v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & CanadaNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People v. BennettNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  3. People v. SimoneNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Vergari v. KendallNew York Supreme Court · 1974
  5. People v. MirandaNew York Supreme Court · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API