Legal Opinion
State Commission for Human Rights v. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry of United States & Canada
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 21, 1968PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles Lambiase, J.
These are two applications: (1) By-respondents to determine “ why the subpoena dated November 27, 1967, issued from Lloyd Hurst, Commissioner of Human Bights, directed to Elmer Walter should not be quashed, vacated and set aside ” (First above set forth); and (2) by petitioner “ for an order pursuant to CPLB § 2308(b) directing the respondent to comply with a subpoena ad testificandum and a subpoena duces tecum both duly issued by Lloyd L. Hurst, as an Investigating Commissioner of the State Commission for Human Rights on November 27, 1967, and both duly served on the respondent on November…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Wilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Grant v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Essgee Co. of China v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- People v. Hvizd, New York County Courts1972