Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Fabrex Corp. & Winard Sales Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 1960PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVincent A. Lupiano, J.

Motion number 68, bearing index number 17308/59, and motion number 159, bearing index number 16457/59, dated December 21, 1959, are consolidated for the purpose of joint disposition.

The first motion by the petitioner seller, Fabrex Corporation, seeks to stay an action pending arbitration. In the second motion, the buyer, Winard Sales Co., moves to stay the pending arbitration.

The facts: The seller, Fabrex Corporation, entered into three contracts with Winard Sales Co. for the sale of a quantity of textile piece goods. Each contract contained a broad arbitration clause which states in part,1 ‘…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Matter of Lipman (Haeuser Shellac Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Matter of Kahn (National City Bank)New York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. S. A. Wenger & Co. v. Propper Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  4. In re the Arbitration between John E. Potter Co. & Miles Metal Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In re the Arbitration between Transpacific Transport Corp. & Sirena Shipping Co., S. A.New York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. In Re the Arbitration Between Weinrott & CarpNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Atcas v. Credit Clearing Corporation of AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  4. In re Kinoshita & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. Goldstein v. DoftDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API