Legal Opinion

In re Kinoshita & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 16, 1961No. 230, Docket 26608PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEDINA, Circuit Judge.

An agreement made in “New York, February 26, 1960” between “Kinoshita & Co., Ltd., Tokyo” and American Oceanic Corporation provided that American Oceanic would as charterer tender at a place and time specified in the contract a “vessel to be named” for charter to Kinoshita at $8 per ton for a voyage to Japan. The vessel was not tendered at the time and place specified in the agreement, although there was considerable correspondence between the parties relative to a possible extension of the time or the substitution of some alternative arrangement.

This maritime contract…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  2. Amicizia Societa Navegazione v. Chilean Nitrate and Iodine Sales CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Robert Lawrence Co. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Metro Industrial Painting Corp. v. Terminal Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  5. In re the Arbitration between Fabrex Corp. & Winard Sales Co.New York Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  3. Seifert v. US Home Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. Louis Dreyfus Negoce S.A. v. Blystad Shipping & Trading Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. Ace Capital Re Overseas Ltd. v. Central United Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API