Legal Opinion

Allen v. . Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1897PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Civil action to liave ■ a charge declared upon land in favor of plain tiffs, tried before Robinson, J., upon a case agreed at Pall Term, 1896, of Halifax Superior Court. There was judgment for the defendants and plaintiffs appealed. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The last will and testament of M. A. Allen, who died in Halifax County, 9 September, 1874, was duly admitted to probate in the December following. The will contained a devise to R. J. Allen, the testator's son, of a tract of land of about 200 acres and a legacy of $940. In a codicil the testator uses of the following language: "Whereas, it is my desire that one of my sons should live at my old residence who bears my family name; in order, therefore, to place it in their power to do so, I make the following provision in Will: If my son, R. J. Allen, will agree to live at my old residence that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Syme v. . BadgerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Mendenhall v. . MendenhallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1860
  3. Doe Ex Dem. Woods v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1853
  4. Rice v. . RiceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Yorkly v. . StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Dunn v. VinyardTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Sessoms v. . SessomsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Helms v. Helms.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  4. Mohn v. MohnSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  5. Hinton v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API