Montgomery v. Board of Administration, Etc.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an action to compel respondents to pay appellants certain employees ’ pension or retirement benefits claimed to have accrued under the provisions of the charter and ordinances of the city of San Diego. The trial court held that none of the appellants were entitled to receive pensions and this appeal followed.
A. R. Kennedy was retired on November 1, 1935, and received his pension up to the date of his death. His widow, Anna Maude Kennedy, succeeded to his pension rights. Except where clarity requires, we will make no distinction between deceased and his widow, the intervener.
The first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- People Ex Rel. State Bd. of Harbor Comm'rs v. KerberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Hodge v. McCallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mulville v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Blanchard v. HartwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Gibson v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Skaggs v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- District Election of Supervisors Committee v. O'ConnorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. Coalition for Economic EquityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.