Legal Opinion

Helvering v. Rankin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 29, 1935No. 582PublishedCited by 264 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Brandeis

The Revenue Act of 1928 (c. 852, §§ 22, 111, 112, 113), provides, as had earlier Revenue Acts, that in computing income from sales of property purchased after February 28, 1913, any excess of the amount realized over cost shall be gain and that any excess of the cost over the amount realized shall be loss. When gain or loss is to be determined on the sale of stock owned outright as an investment, the identification of the shares sold with those purchased ordinarily presents no difficulty. But when the taxpayer has engaged in marginal transactions on a stock exchange, the identification of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Phillips v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Old Colony Trust Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Burnet v. LeiningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Richardson v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by264 opinions

  1. Pullman-Standard v. SwintSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bixby v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  3. Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  4. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Helvering v. National Grocery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

259 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API