Legal Opinion

United States v. Tarmon

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 25, 1964No. Cr. No. 26532PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMSEN, Chief Judge.

This case presents the question whether and under what circumstances “taking” migratory birds during the hunting season in a field over which corn has been scattered before the season opens amounts to a violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 703-711, and regulations promulgated thereunder.

The information filed against Tarmon, Brogley and five others charges that on or about the 9th day of November, 1962, the defendants “without being permitted so to do by any regulation made, adopted, and approved under the authority of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Herman E. Koop, Jr., Leonard Doubek, Albert J. Peters, Nicholas M. Wenner, Herman E. Koop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1961
  2. United States v. SchultzeDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1939
  3. Cerritos Gun Club v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  4. United States v. ReeseDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1939

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. John L. IrelandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. ArdoinDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1977
  3. United States v. AtkinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1979
  4. Lowery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API