United States v. Atkinson
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.
The twenty-one defendants in this action have been charged pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i) with hunting migratory waterfowl over a baited area. Under 16 U.S.C. § 707, each defendant if convicted is subject to a fine of up to $500, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. The defendants have moved the Court to dismiss the charges against them on the grounds that 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i) on their face and as applied to the defendants are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, thereby denying to defendants due…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- United States v. Louis Delahoussaye, David Lemoyne Knerien and Robert Lee RichardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stepniewski v. GagnonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
- People v. WellsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010