Legal Opinion

United States v. Atkinson

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided April 23, 1979No. 78-CR-175PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

REYNOLDS, Chief Judge.

The twenty-one defendants in this action have been charged pursuant to 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i) with hunting migratory waterfowl over a baited area. Under 16 U.S.C. § 707, each defendant if convicted is subject to a fine of up to $500, imprisonment for up to six months, or both. The defendants have moved the Court to dismiss the charges against them on the grounds that 16 U.S.C. § 703 and 50 C.F.R. § 20.21(i) on their face and as applied to the defendants are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad, thereby denying to defendants due…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. Missouri v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  5. United States v. Louis Delahoussaye, David Lemoyne Knerien and Robert Lee RichardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stepniewski v. GagnonDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1983
  2. People v. WellsSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API