Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lowery v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 28, 2013No. 26Published

1Dissent

McDONALD, J.,

dissenting, in which HARRELL and BARBERA, JJ., join.

The Petitioner, Edward Lowery, is in the business of harvesting clams from the bottom of the public waters of the Chesapeake Bay. The law regulates that trade closely, in part because some methods of harvesting — such as that used by Mr. Lowery in this case — rely on a hydraulic dredge to blast the bottom of the Bay, thereby destroying submerged aquatic vegetation (“SAV”) and threatening the balance of the Bay’s *506ecosystem.1 The Legislature has made SAV zones off limits to that method of harvesting, with transgressions subject to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Smack v. Department of Health & Mental HygieneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Benik v. HatcherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  5. Hastings v. PNC Bank, NA.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API