Legal Opinion
Amariglio v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 20, 1996No. Civil Action 94-1049 (JHG)PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOYCE HENS GREEN, District Judge.
Presently pending is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be granted.
Background
The following material facts are not genuinely disputed. In July 1987, Plaintiff Jack Amariglio was hired by AMTRAK to work as a train attendant aboard coaches and sleeping cars. Amariglio’s general responsibilities involved providing assistance to passengers to ensure they had a safe and comfortable trip aboard AMTRAK trains. Amariglio performed a broad range of duties, including loading supplies,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- School Bd. of Nassau Cty. v. ArlineSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- James H. Neal v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, MayorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kalekiristos v. CTS Hotel Management Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Cooke-Seals v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Wilson v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Murphy v. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Dorchy v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.