Legal Opinion

Hamm v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 16, 2006No. CR 05-676PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Betty C. Dickey, Justice.

Appellant Phillip Hamm was convicted of the rape of M.C., a minor, by a jury in the Faulkner County Circuit Court. The Arkansas Court of Appeals reversed the decision of the trial court and remanded for a new trial, ruling that the testimony of a witness for the State had been improperly admitted under the “pedophile exception” to Ark. R. Evid. 404(b). See Hamm v. State, 91 Ark. App. 177, 209 S.W.3d 414 (2005). We granted the State’s petition for review pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 2-4 (2005). We find no error and affirm the decision of the circuit court.

Although his…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Stone v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Cluck v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  4. Free v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
  5. Coggin v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Lard v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
  3. Lamb v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  4. Kelley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. White v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API