State v. Hill
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SOMERVILLE, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was found guilty by a jury of stealing a motor vehicle. He was sentenced by the court to four years confinement in the Department of Corrections in view of the jury’s inability to agree upon his punishment.
By a timely appeal defendant seeks to set aside his conviction and sentence on two grounds: (1) the trial court erred in admitting his extrajudicial oral confession prior to proof by the state of the corpus delicti of the crime; and (2) the state failed to meet its burden of proof because of a material and prejudicial variance between the information…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- State v. RohmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- State v. EasleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- State v. Nicoletti.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. DeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. GreathouseMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. GobbleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. PulisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. McCoyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.