Legal Opinion
Sawink, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking Authority
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 6, 2012PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*927OPINION BY
Judge LEAVITT.
Sawink, Inc., Germantown Cab Company and Rosemont Taxicab Co., Inc. (Petitioners) have filed a petition for review in this Court’s original jurisdiction. Petitioners are taxicab companies operating under a certificate of public convenience issued by the Public Utility Commission and do not have medallions issued by the Philadelphia Parking Authority. As such, Petitioners have limited authority to operate within the City of Philadelphia. When some of Petitioners’ drivers exceeded those limits, the Parking Authority impounded their cabs. Petitioners seek declaratory and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. Commonwealth, Insurance DepartmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. ReaserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. CluckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. Transit Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pilchesky v. Lackawanna CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Bucks County Services, Inc. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Snyder Brothers, Inc. v. PA PUC PA Independent Oil & Gas Association v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Germantown Cab Co. v. Philadelphia Parking AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.