Legal Opinion

Rosemont Taxicab Co. v. Phila. Parking Auth.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided June 26, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-3601PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Padova, District Judge.

The Philadelphia Parking Authority ("PPA") through its Taxi and Limousine Division ("TLD") routinely seizes without a warrant vehicles that are suspected of being used as taxicabs that do not have a PPA inspection sticker. Plaintiffs Rosemont Taxicab Co., Inc. ("Rosemont") and Germantown Cab Company ("GCC") filed this lawsuit alleging that the PPA's practice violates their rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States Constitution and parallel provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution (Counts I and II). They also seek declaratory relief that a…

2Cases cited80 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. ALLEN v. STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT SOMERSET DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  2. ANDREWS v. JPA R/E ASSOCIATES, L.P.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  3. AnimalScan, LLC v. Live Oak Veterinary Specialists, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. DARBY v. 120 NORTHAMPTON, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
  5. EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY v. ASPEN FLOW CONTROL, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2021

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API