Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Cluck
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided December 2, 1977No. 1712PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CERCONE, Judge:
The instant appeal arises from appellant’s conviction for violating The Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act, 35 P.S. § 780-101 (1977) (Hereinafter, CSDD & C). In particular, the jury found appellant guilty of sale at retail of a nonproprietary drug. Id. at § 780-113(a)(10). On appeal appellant argues: (1) The Commonwealth permitted an unreasonable period of time to elapse between the date of the offense and the date of appellant’s arrest; (2) The Commonwealth improperly permitted testimony concerning an out-of-court photographic identification; (3) The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Commonwealth v. ClairSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SojournerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Commonwealth v. ReaserSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. MlinarichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Commonwealth v. HarrisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Sondergaard v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.