Legal Opinion
United States v. Shah
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 21, 1989No. Nos. 88-1061 to 88-1063, 88-1076 to 88-1078, 88-1085, 88-1086, 88-1115, 88-1119, 88-1123 and 88-1126PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUG, Circuit Judge:
Defendants appeal the district court’s denial of their motions to dismiss the indictment or, in the alternative, to compel discovery of grand jury proceedings. We hold that the orders appealed from fail to meet the final judgment rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1982) and dismiss the appeals.
I
Defendants were charged in a 47-count indictment with possessing cocaine and marijuana with intent to distribute, conspiring to do the same, subscribing false tax returns, and defrauding the government. In several motions, defendants urged the district court to dismiss the indictment for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Bank of Nova Scotia v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States v. John A. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Jose Ernesto Moreno-Green, Joaquin Arturo Contreras, Oscar Lara Navarrete, Jose Ignacio Acosta-Medina, and Alejo Hernandez DominguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Arnold Sherlock, United States of America v. Benjamin CharleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Clifford Bird, Sr., United States of America v. Wesley Lane CrawfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. HickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.