Legal Opinion

Dunlap Appeal

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1952No. Appeal, 37PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

This is an appeal from a decree affirming a decision of the Zoning Board of Adjustment of Sharon Hill, which refused to grant appellants a variance permitting them to construct row houses in that community. Appellants attack the constitutionality of the ordinance which prohibits row houses on the theory that it invades vested rights and is an unreasonable classification.

Appellants’ “vested rights” are said to stem from the expenditure between 1928 and 1930 of $27,971.16 for installation of water, sewer, and gas mains, and street curbing in accordance…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Taylor v. MooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Devereux Foundation, Inc., Zoning CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  5. Taylor v. Haverford TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  3. Michener AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Baum v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  5. Glorioso AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API